How are the sequences from ‘Pillow talk’ and ‘fringe’ different? Discuss he difference in pace and style of editing as well as the effect the editing has on meaning/the audience’s receptions of the extracts.
The film ‘Pillow talk’ and the TV show ‘Fringe’ are two extracts that have been carefully selected for comparison because they are from different time decades and portray different emotions. The film ‘Pillow talk’ was released in 1959 and it is a romantic comedy directed by Michael Gordon; in the film extract the camera movement is very basic and no special effects are used in the scenery. On the other hand, ‘Fringe’ is a science fiction US Television show from 2008 and uses Computer Generated Imagery (CGI) to capture and express high quality action sequences.
There are many factors that affect the audience in the extracts, such as the pace and style of editing, and the effect the editing has itself.
At first glance, in comparison with the two extracts, a noticeable difference is the use of diegetic and non-diegetic sound. In pillow talk there are no non-diegetic sounds throughout the whole extract, there are only diegetic sounds (e.g. the pianist and guitarist at 3:53), the most likely reason is because of the insufficient technology in 1959. However, since then technology has advanced and the use of sound effects have been brought into the world of media. In the fringe extract at 0:17, we hear a phased non-diegetic sound, which represents the sound of the blimp teleporting. The use of the sound effect, along with the teleporting blimp, has an effect on the whole extract. From that scene (0:16 – 0:21) we can see straight away that fringe is set way ahead of reality, and is set in the future, and we can see that because of the use of CGI and non-diegetic sound. However in Pillow talk we can see that all sounds used are diegetic (e.g. the phone ringing at 0:25 – 0:28), and no special effects are used, which puts more attention from the audience to what the characters are saying, helping the audience concentrate on what emotions are being expressed by the actors.
The style and pace of the editing between the two extracts are very unconventional and have a very diverse range of shots, which appeal to both target audiences. In the ‘fringe’ extract, the average shot length is between 2-4 seconds, and show clean cuts to show the facial expressions from the characters, and to help the audience see how they are reacting consistently as the extract plays through. The director does this effect to help the audience to connect with the characters, and link their emotions with the character, so the audience can feel what the character feels. The audience are also able to see what the reality of the world outside is like in the scene with the teleporting blimp (0:16 – 0:21), the director add this scene for dramatic effect and portrays the feeling to the audience that something is building up because of the sudden change of action. Whereas in the ‘Pillow talk’ extract, the shot lengths are fairly long, and the sequence can run for a longer period of time without cutting because its not a fast paced film, so there is no need for the sharp and witty cuts to keep the audience’s attention. For example the first scene in the extract (0:00 – 0:22), it takes 22 seconds for a cut to be made, and the editor adds a transition to make the scene fade into each other. The reason the transition is added is because it adds a calm and smooth effect, so that the cut is sleek, and the tension is kept low-key.
The different styles of editing from the different directors are easily noticed when watching the 2 extracts.
In the ‘Pillow talk’ extract from 0:30 to 1:38, we as an audience see a split screen effect when the 2 characters are on the telephone to each other. This is a very simple and basic editing technique, yet in 1959 it was very effective. It allows the audience to see both characters facial expressions at the same time as the conversation between them progresses and elevates. Contrasting to ‘Pillow talk’, at the beginning of the ‘Fringe’ extract we can also see the 2 characters on a phone call to each other, except it is a high tech video call, and we can only see them both because of the use of cuts, and not because of the split screen technique. This effect is also useful because of the way an audience can focus on what’s important in the shot, but we cannot see them at the same time, giving a different editing effect to the ‘Pillow talk’ extract.
Finally, the lighting and colour in both extracts effectively creates a mood and sets the scene, so in these extracts we’re contrasting between dark and light. The use of mis-en-scene lighting is very effective as it correlates with the mood of the scene. The use of light and backlights, for example in ‘Pillow talk’, helps create the smooth and calm scenery. On the other hand, we can see in the ‘Fringe’ extract, that the dark and minimal back lights, helps creates tension and helps build up the sci-fi and action mood of the sequence.
In conclusion, we can see that both directors and editors have a distinctive difference in their style, pace, and the effect they portray when creating and publishing their work. We learn to admire the simplicity and basic effects used in the ‘Pillow talk’ extract because of the time era of 1959, and the fact of the insufficient technology they had. Furthermore, we can also start to admire the use of CGI and special effects in the ‘Fringe’ extract, as the director and editors use these effects very professionally to create a range of different emotions.